Professionals Urge End to Water Fluoridation
November 25, 2007
New York - Over 1,100 dentists, physicians, scientists, academics and environmentalists urge Congress to stop water fluoridation until Congressional hearings are conducted. They cite new scientific evidence that fluoridation, long promoted to fight tooth decay, is ineffective and has serious health risks. (fluorideaction.org)
Signers include a Nobel Prize winner, three members of the prestigious 2006 National Research Council (NRC) panel that reported on fluoride’s toxicology, two officers in the Union representing professionals at EPA headquarters, the President of the International Society of Doctors for the Environment, and hundreds of medical, dental, academic, scientific and environmental professionals, worldwide.
Signer Dr. Arvid Carlsson, winner of the 2000 Nobel Prize for Medicine, says, “Fluoridation is against all principles of modern pharmacology. It’s really obsolete.”
An Online Action Petition to Congress in support of the Professionals’ Statement is available on FAN’s web site, www.fluorideaction.org.
“The NRC report dramatically changed scientific understanding of fluoride’s health risks,” says Paul Connett, PhD, Executive Director, Fluoride Action Network. “Government officials who continue to promote fluoridation must testify under oath as to why they are ignoring the powerful evidence of harm in the NRC report,” he added.
An Assistant NY State Attorney General calls the report “the most up-to-date expert authority on the health effects of fluoride exposure.”
The Professionals’ Statement also references:
– The new American Dental Association policy recommending infant formula NOT be prepared with fluoridated water.
– The CDC’s concession that the predominant benefit of fluoride is topical not systemic.
– CDC data showing that dental fluorosis, caused by fluoride over-exposure, now impacts one third of American children.
– Major research indicating little difference in decay rates between fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities.
– A Harvard study indicating a possible link between fluoridation and bone cancer.
– The silicofluoride chemicals used for fluoridation are contaminated industrial waste and have never been FDA- approved for human ingestion.
The Environmental Working Group (EWG), a DC watchdog, revealed that a Harvard professor concealed the fluoridation/bone cancer connection for three years. EWG President Ken Cook states, “It is time for the US to recognize that fluoridation has serious risks that far outweigh any minor benefits, and unlike many other environmental issues, it’s as easy to end as turning off a valve at the water plant.”
Partially, as a result of this statement, at least one city, Cobleskill NY, stopped 54 years of water fluoridation. See: http://www.fluoridealert.org/news/2998.html
Many communities rejected or stopped fluoridation over the years. See: http://www.fluoridealert.org/communities.htm
On October 2, Juneau Alaska voters rejected fluoridation despite the American Dental Association’s $150,000 political campaign to return fluoride into the water supply after the legislative body voted it out.
Take Action to End Fluoridation. Sign the Online Petition to End Fluoridation and call for a Congressional Hearing
http://www.actionstudio.org/public/page_view_all.cfm?option=begin&pageid=8276
Contact: Bill Osmunson, DDS, MPH, Fluoride Action Network Spokesperson
bill@teachingsmiles.com Office 503.675.7300 Cell 425.466.0100 (Pacific Time)
or
Paul Connett, PhD, Canton, NY, Emeritus Professor of Chemistry and Executive Director, Fluoride Action Network, 315-379-9200 paul@fluoridealert.org
Sent: NYSCOF
Source: Fluoride Action Network http://www.FluorideAction.Net
News Comments for this Article
5 Responses to “Professionals Urge End to Water Fluoridation”
Got something to say? Be sure you've read and understand our (Terms of Service)
You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. More...





Indeed, those ruthless individuals, who deliberately & knowingly keep promoting this fraudulent shameless racket & practice, deserve to be held accountable for each act of harm, be it present, or future!!
- Posted by: Danny
Natural occurring fluoride is called calcium fluoride. Calcium mitigates the toxic effects of fluoride. It takes 20 times more calcium fluoride to kill 50% of laboratory guinea pigs than it takes for any of the three fluoridation compounds.
90% of tooth decay occurs where fluoridation was never claimed to be effective; the pits and fissures of teeth. Thus, for decades, dentists have been applying plastic sealants to the chewing surfaces of the molars.
The Journal of Public Health Dentistry reported, “50% of US Head Start children have had Baby Bottle Tooth Decay”. Use of Sippy Cups is extending this rampant decay caused by high levels of tooth-surface bacteria that thrive on sugar and pass their acidic waste onto the tooth surface causing the decay. Fluoridated water does not kill the strep mutan bacteria that causes tooth decay.
Advances in Dental Research, June, 1994:
“Overall, an average of 86.8% of the dose was retained by the infants, which is about 50% higher than would be expected for adults. …the pharmacokinetics of fluoride in infants reveal(s) a completely different pattern compared to what has been found in adults.” There is a clear need for more information about the renal handling and general metabolism of fluoride in young children and the elderly.”
- Posted by: Maureen Jones
To accelerate your awareness on the subject of fluoride and your FDA benefactors, go to Google Video and search for the 29 minute video called ‘Fluoride Deception’, a videotaped book review with the author/researcher Christopher Bryson. Ignorance (willfully ignoring) is not blissful. Now that you know, Share the Truth. Best wishes, Joe, a Ron Paul Supporter.
- Posted by: Roland L. Joe Crapo Sr.
[…] Originally Posted by Hafke What’s wrong with fluoride in the water? Who has legalised the cultivation of legalised hemp? Although there are a lot of regulations, EVERY developed nation on Earth has a commercial hemp crop. New South Wales on Australia has recently approved hemp cultivation. New direction for hemp - National Rural News - Grains and Cropping - General - Stock & Land The UK HAS BEEN GROWING COMMMERCIAL HEMP SINCE THE 1990S. Canada has as well. The hemp industry is one of the fastest growing industries in the US, but we have to import all of our hemp, mostly from Canada. Several states in the US have legalized hemp production, but the FEDGOV abuses it’s authority and forbids hemp cultivation. The FEDGOV has NO RIGHT to dictate hemp prohibition to states. Vermont is one of the most recent to legalize hemp cultivation. Wisconsin Ag Connection - National/World News - Hemp Bill Becomes Law in Vermont Hemp can be used for thousands of products. According to a 1938 Popular Mechanics story, hemp can be used for 25,000 products. The seed is the 2nd highest source of protein none to man, 2nd only to soy. The seed has all 21 of the essential oils that the human body needs. Hemp can be used for rope, canvas, paper, clothing, many types of food and beauty products, plastics and many other products. A RECENT STORY FORM BBC…. BBC NEWS | UK | Northern Ireland | Foyle and West | Hemp catching on with NW farmers A recent Ohio State student newspaper stated……… Adam Eidinger, a spokesman for the group Vote Hemp in Bedford, Mass., said he estimated the current market for hemp products at more than $275 million annually and increasing. According to a U.S. Department of Agriculture report, however, the market for hemp in the U.S. will remain small because of hemp’s competition with other more-established raw materials and manufacturing practices. Today much of the hemp sold in the U.S. is imported from Canada, which in 1998 legalized the cultivation of Cannabis sativa with less than one percent THC. According to the Hemp Industries Association, the U.S. is the only industrialized nation not to permit the production of hemp. Line between hemp and marijuana still blurry to U.S. - Arts While states in the US beg the FEDGOV for permission to engage in hemp studies and trials, the 275 million dollar a year hemp industry continue to grow. We have been talking about HEMP studies for decades. We don’t need anymore studies. We need legalization of hemp cultivation, just like in the UK, Australia, Canada, and other countries. A USA Today article from 2005…. Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Montana and West Virginia also have passed hemp-farming bills. The DEA says allowing farmers to grow hemp in the USA would undermine the war on drugs. It says marijuana growers would be able to camouflage their crop with similar-looking hemp plants, and that DEA agents would have difficulty quickly telling the difference. "Let’s not be na?ve," says Tom Riley of the White House Office on National Drug Control Policy. "The pro-dope people have been pushing hemp for 20 years because they know that if they can have hemp fields, then they can have marijuana fields. It’s … stoner logic." USATODAY.com - ‘Industrial’ hemp support takes root THIS ARGUMENT from the DEA is truly "stoner logic." What is the DEA smoking, since no pot grower would ever mix marijuana plants with hemp, since they cross pollinate and ruin the marijuana. This is common sense to everyone, except the morons at the DEA. Marijuana is the number one cash crop in the US. According to the last NIDA survey, more high school seniors said they could pot easier than beer, or cigarettes. So someone please tell me, how could making hemp legal significantly change the ease in which marijuana is obtained in the US? DEA=MORONS. As to fluoride, the former president of the Canadian Dental Association supported water fluoridation his entire career, until he was convinced by a friend to do his "own research." Now he has spoken out against water fluoridation. Dr. Hardy Limeback: Why I am now officially opposed to adding fluoride to drinking water The scientists union at the FDA is also against water fluoridation. May 1, 1999 WHY EPA’S HEADQUARTERS UNION OF SCIENTISTS OPPOSES FLUORIDATION Why U.S. Environmental Protection Agency scientists oppose fluoridation One of the leading experts in New Zealand was also a strong supporter of water fluoridation, until he researched the numbers on request of the government. He changed his mind on water fluoridation as well. Why I changed my mind about water fluoridation 50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation Updated April 12, 2004 by Paul Connett, PhD Professor of Chemistry St. Lawrence University 50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation New York - Over 1,100 dentists, physicians, scientists, academics and environmentalists urge Congress to stop water fluoridation until Congressional hearings are conducted. They cite new scientific evidence that fluoridation, long promoted to fight tooth decay, is ineffective and has serious health risks. Professionals Urge End to Water Fluoridation : NewsLI.com - Long Island News, News Long Island […]
- Posted by: Find out when you should die,an envirowacko webpage for kids - Page 2 - U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum
I really like your website you have some great post I’m looking for a cheap washer machine repairman.
- Posted by: laundry yellow pages